The more powerful turbocharged engine is rated at 22 mpg city and 27 highway. The base 2.5-liter engine is rated at 24 mpg in the city and 30 mpg on the highway. With two engine options, the CX-5 has two fuel-economy ratings. The Signature model we tested had a reassuring brake-pedal feel that operated without delay and without being too touchy when you apply the brakes.Īndi Hedrick | Car and Driver Fuel Economy and Real-World MPG The electrically assisted steering provides satisfying responses. At the same time, the Mazda comes alive on curvy roads. Pavement imperfections are isolated, road noise is minimal, and the damping is neither stiff nor floaty. This harmonious interplay of dynamics is unrivaled by its competitors. But it also soaks up rough roads without commotion and has the ride quality of crossovers that cost twice as much. Sure, its precise steering and composed cornering make for one helluva Sunday cruise. You don't need to drive the CX-5 hard to enjoy it or to appreciate its excellence. Both engines pair with a snappy six-speed automatic transmission and all-wheel drive. The 256-hp turbocharged version we tested provided much quicker acceleration. It's at higher speeds, such as when trying to pass or merge onto the freeway, that it feels underpowered. The CX-5's standard 187-hp four-cylinder engine has great throttle response when pulling away from stoplights or hustling around town, so it feels quicker than it actually is. Its interior mirrors that sportiness with red accents and stitching. Its exterior is elegantly sporty with trim-specific gloss-black accents. With the upgraded 256-hp turbocharged engine, its quickness better corresponds with its athletic handling. We think the Turbo trim best exemplifies the CX-5.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |